Sunday, 15 May 2011

Jude Evans reviews The City Madam

Directed by Dominic Hill
Royal Shakespeare Company, Swan Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon
Tuesday 10th May, 2011

Matti Houghton, Sara Crowe and Lucy Briggs-Owen in The City Madam.  Photo by Ellie Kurttz.
Photo: Ellie Kurttz













Massinger’s seldom performed play gets the outing it deserves on the Swan stage. Dominic Hill’s production shows just how wonderfully funny it really is, with the actors performing the heightened characters to superb effect. But beneath its laugh out loud surface, the production reveals the play’s deeper concern with the destructive forces of selfishness, greed and desire. Hill proves just how modern and relevant this play is for us today.

Set in the London of Charles I, Massinger’s city comedy dramatises the opulent and decadent nature of the Caroline reign. We follow Luke Frugal as he enters the household of his older brother, Sir John, where he is looked down upon by Sir John’s social climbing wife and daughters. Suddenly left in charge of the household, Luke begins to be corrupted by the world of money and wealth he has entered into. His journey is peopled by many characters, from those of new and old money, to a prostitute and a stargazer.

The audience will frequently be tickled by Hill’s production. Elaborate costumes, make-up and wigs are enough to trigger suppressed giggles, and coupled with the actors’ haughty mannerisms it is difficult not to burst out into laughter. But the play’s darker side is never far away. The elaborate features appear a sign of grotesque greed and opulence when viewed against Tom Piper’s brilliantly simple set. The design later complements the plain, prisoner-like costumes which appear as the production progresses. Tim Mitchell’s lighting also works to great effect. The stage is dimly lit by footlights giving the actors a rough, harsh appearance, and creating a dense atmosphere in the relatively small space of the Swan Theatre.

In a play with a large number of characters to portray, all roles are well performed by a strong ensemble cast. Jo Stone-Fewings is excellent as Luke, capturing his shifting nature as he becomes increasingly corrupt. The foolishness of Lady Frugal and her daughters is superbly played by Sara Crowe, Lucy Briggs-Owen and Matti Houghton who even manage to bring a touch of vulnerability to their roles and elicit a small amount of sympathy. And in the underworld, Pippa Nixon’s Cockney prostitute, Shave’em, is highly entertaining.

This is certainly a thoroughly enjoyable production, and one which resonates with our own time. It is wonderful to see the Swan back in full flow with stagings of seventeenth-century drama. And long may it last.

Jude Evans, age 22

Tuesday, 26 April 2011

Young People's Forum - 20th April

On a gorgeous sunny evening outside the Swan Theatre the RSC Young People’s Forum met to discuss all things RSC. All thirty-something of us introduced ourselves, and it was great to see new faces and those who’d been before.

The first discussion topic was what the next RSC Key competition should be. The first idea was creative writing. Some were in favour of this, others thought it might be too narrow. It spurred a lot of other suggestions including visual art options, multimedia and a more open creative competition allowing RSC Key members to use whatever creative skills they have.

From this discussion developed ideas of running sessions at the RSC prior to competitions, in creative writing or multimedia or another area, in order to enable all members to feel they can enter. And on a side note, we all agreed that we would be interested in sessions about the work of different departments at the RSC, such as Marketing.

The next discussion topic was an ambassador scheme, with the idea of having some Forum members representing the RSC Key in different venues, including schools and universities. We talked about how many there should be and how to become an ambassador.

Finally, a question was raised about the name of the Forum, whether it should stay the RSC Young People’s Forum – a little lengthy – or have a new title called the RSC Key Forum – a little sharper.

All discussion topics will be developed in the next couple of months, so keep checking Facebook, Twitter and the Blog for future information!

Jude Evans, 22

Monday, 25 April 2011

Anna Laycock reviews Cardenio - Shakespeare's 'Lost Play' Re-imagined

Shakespeare’s ‘Lost Play’ re-imagined
Directed by Gregory Doran
Swan Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon
Wednesday 20th April 2011

Whether Shakespeare really wrote a play about “Cardenio” or not, we will never know. However, in my opinion, the authorship of the play does not matter, Greg Doran’s re-imagining of “Cardenio” allows the play to be excellent in its own right and not because of any links it may have to the Bard.

“Cardenio” is the result of literary archaeology from the RSC. In 1772, Lewis Theobald claimed to have obtained three manuscripts of an unnamed play by Shakespeare which he edited and published under the name of “Double Falsehood”. “Double Falsehood” has the plot of the Cardenio episode in “Don Quixote”. Using both “Double Falsehood”, “Don Quixote” and other sources Doran has managed to re-imagine the story for a modern audience to enjoy.

From the beginning the audience are transported into the world of sixteenth century Spain, as we find ourselves looking inside a domineering Catholic monastery. Religion is a prevalent motif throughout the play, and appears a controlling force, with characters questioning and blaming God for what happens to them. However, the lustful behaviour of the leads, Cardenio and especially Fernando, along with the pagan villagers and Spanish flamenco style music provide a contrast to the formalities and rules of Catholicism.

Much like a Shakespearean comedy, the play centres around two couples kept apart from their lovers due to disapproval from their families. Cardenio is in love with Luscinda, but her father insists that her father give his approval before the relationship continues. On the other hand, Fernando falls in love with Dorotea, a farmer’s daughter, thus his love threatens his reputation and status as the son of a Duke. The play has many very funny moments, yet, the tone changes throughout the piece and comes close to tragic just before the interval before reviving itself for the denouement where confusions are resolved and the couples reconciled reminiscent to such comedies as “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” and “Much Ado about Nothing”.

The new fiftieth birthday season ensemble is a group of very strong performers, not only can they act but also in “Cardenio” we witness members singing and dancing. The four leads particularly stand out; Oliver Rix portrays the charming Cardenio descend into madness after losing his lover with flair and whereas Alex Hassel may look similar to Rix in looks but his character, Fernando, is clearly the mischievous antagonist of the play. Pippa Nixon as Dorotea displays the subtle insecurity of the possessed and abandoned farmer’s daughter perfectly in the first half before gaining confidence and self-assurance towards the end. Furthermore, Lucy Briggs-Owen highlights both the innocence and strength in Luscinda’s character.

The motto “the show must go on” came into effect during the performance when the fire alarm went off about forty minutes into the first act and the audience, staff and cast members all evacuated outside the building. It might be said the alarm is the fault of Shakespeare’s said-to-be cursed play, Macbeth, which was being performed next door in the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, although luckily the curse did little to affect the performance as it was a false alarm and the show continued as if nothing had happened.

Doran’s "Cardenio" is a highly joyful experience of theatre. For once all credit must be given to Doran, the ensemble and the team of design, music, lighting, sound, and movement directors for the creation of Cardenio rather than William Shakespeare.


Anna Laycock, age 19

Sunday, 24 April 2011

Dan Hutton reviews Cardenio - Shakespeare's 'Lost Play' Re-imagined

Shakespeare’s ‘Lost Play’ re-imagined
Directed by Gregory Doran
Swan Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon
Wednesday 20th April 2011

The performance reviewed was a preview performance. Press night is Wednesday 27th April.

In a recent directing workshop, I was given one sterling piece of advice to remember when trying my hand at directing: “You’ll never be as good as Shakespeare”. What’s beautiful about Greg Doran’s so-called ‘re-imagining’ of Shakespeare’s Cardenio is that in all the publicity and in performance it never professes to be as good as anything the Bard could have written, constantly taking a tongue-in-cheek look at the classic Shakespearean comedy.

Piecing together pieces of Lewis Theobold’s Double Falsehood (which was supposedly based on a manuscript of Fletcher and Shakespeare’s Cardenio), Shelton’s translation of Don Quixote and Doran’s own ingenuity, the tone of Cardenio is never able to shake off the feeling of being a cross-centuries collaboration. Some lines feel solidly Elizabethan (“There’s not a maid whose eye with virgin gaze/ Pierces not my guilt”), but elsewhere relatively modern (“There is a woman, sir, there is a woman”). This doesn’t matter, however, for the themes of the play – those of consent and deceit, favourites of Shakespearean comedy – go hand in hand with the atonal language.

It is a perfect formula for a Shakespearean comedy; two men fighting over one woman, even though one of the men is already married. Through disguise and treachery they eventually get what they want and everyone lives happily ever after. The character of Doritea – the second woman – is questionable, as she returns to the man who abused her in the style of Hero, but the strong speeches she is given in the second half of the play remedy that somewhat.

Doran’s joyful production revels in the references to other comedies while taking a look at the darker undertones of religion in the play. Paul Englishby’s remarkable score reverberates around the small space, taking us from brazen ritual to quiet prayer. Niki Turner’s semi-reflective set, lit by Tim Mitchell, facilitates these tonal changes, and the strip of mirror revealed at the back of the stage suggests we are only peeking momentarily into the history behind this lost play.

The four young leads all impress. Pippa Nixon as Doritea copes well with a difficult role, gaining confidence later in the play and showing a strong resolve, even if the script doesn’t. Lucy Briggs-Owen’s Luscinda, the object of the two male leads’ desires, is charmingly innocent, being won over by Oliver Rix’ exuding charisma in his professional debut as Cardenio. Most impressive is Alex Hassell in the role of the loveable antagonist Fernando, a deeply flawed character who wins our empathy through hilarious asides and looks to the audience. Among the strong ensemble, Christopher Ettridge and Christopher Godwin both stand out as the two surprisingly liberal (for Shakespeare) fathers.

Fittingly for the RSC’s Fiftieth Birthday season, Cardenio offers a meta-theatrical look at Shakespearean comedy, straddling five centuries and being fully aware of its roots. It’s unlikely to become part of the canon anytime soon, but it’s no doubt a production which Shakespeare would be able to watch and recognise as something he had a hand in creating.


Dan Hutton

Saturday, 19 March 2011

Anna Laycock reviews King Lear at the new Royal Shakespeare Theatre

Directed by David Farr
Royal Shakespeare Company, The Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon
Friday 25th February 2011

















Although I did not know King Lear well, I still was very keen to watch it being performed at the new Royal Shakespeare Theatre last week. I was most excited to see one of the first performances on the new stage, and to see for myself whether the thrust layout really is much more effective than the proscenium arch.

From the moment I walked into the foyer of the new theatre I knew that I was entering into something very grand, the front of house area really has been transformed and is much more spacious. Instead of being cramped into one space, audience members can browse in the shop located by the box office, or wonder round the corner to the cafe, explore an exhibition room, have a bite to eat at the Rooftop Restaurant or just simply wait by the theatre bar and admire the view over the river basin. Touches like, projecting photographs from past productions onto the wall beside the cafe and the opportunity to add your message to a web of words keep audience members waiting to take their seats entertained.

When I took my seat at the back row of the upper circle I knew I did not have to worry about not hearing or seeing the action as even being right at the back I was no more than 15 feet away from the stage, much closer than the back seats of the old theatre. Also, the thrust stage made the special effects involved so much more effective such as the rain falling on Lear and sandbags falling from the ceiling, effects that would not have worked as well at all in a proscenium arch space. Furthermore, the play made good use of the space, playing to all sides of the auditorium so that all audience members felt involved.

Greg Hicks made a brilliant King Lear, his portrayal of an authoritive leader descended into madness always had an element of black comedy as well as tragedy. Sophie Russell made a highly entertaining Fool, often making the audience laugh. Another stand-out performance was Tunji Kasim as the manipulative Edmund, who with his cunning words almost managed to win over the audience.

Overall, my experience at the new RST was highly enjoyable and will certainly be an experience I will be having many times again!

Anna Laycock, age 19

Photo by Manual Harlan

Sunday, 27 February 2011

Keeping a Blog by Jude Evans















I began my ‘Book Blog’ towards the end of 2010, after having kept other blogs over the past couple of years. With this new blog I’ve finally found my niche. Keeping this blog allows me to channel my passion for literature into something productive. I’m able to keep up what I love doing – combining my love of reading and watching novels and poetry, films and theatre productions, with my love of analysing literature. My blog is also a space for me to keep a record of all that I read and see, and to develop my skills as a writer. Friends and family are also able to read about what I’ve been doing – and I don’t need to chew their ears off about the latest book I’ve read!

Having blogged for the past couple of years, and having read the blogs of others, it seems a brilliant thing to do. It’s your own space to write about pretty much whatever you want, and to be creative in designing it. It can range from being a journal-type blog, a literature-based blog (Dan Hutton's theatre blog is fantastic), to one charting a personal project (take a peek at Samantha Edwards’ ‘Bard-a-thon’). A lot of bloggers, and indeed non-bloggers, enjoy reading and discovering other people’s blogs (it’s amazing the variety out there). Ultimately, blogging is fun, and it can be a really satisfying thing to do!

You can take a peek at my blog at: www.thebookblogger-fairophelia.blogspot.com

Jude Evans, age 22

Friday, 4 February 2011

Liberty Jackson reviews Matilda, A Musical

Directed by Matthew Warchus
Royal Shakespeare Company, The Courtyard Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon

I remember when I first found out that the RSC were staging a musical production of Roald Dahl’s Matilda. I had just sat down to watch their 2009 production of Arabian Nights. I opened the programme and was flicking through when I suddenly saw an A4 poster advert for Matilda. I was 16 at the time, (I’m 17 now) and my dad turned to me and said, ‘Won’t you be too old then?’ I looked at him like he was mad – my favourite book, my favourite film, being put on stage, and as a musical... I was so excited! I enjoyed Arabian Nights immensely, but throughout I couldn’t quite get over the fact that Matilda was being made into a musical – in my hometown!
Fast forward to November 2010 when Matilda, A Musical opened.  With the book and indeed, film adaptation as iconic works in the arts industry, I was intrigued to find out how Dennis Kelly and Tim Minchin would make their mark on the RSC’s new production.
I feel privileged in two ways; not only was I lucky enough to see Matilda five times, I was also fortunate to see each team perform! My first visit to the Courtyard to see Matilda, I saw the team headed by Kerry Ingram as Matilda. Even as I was walking to take my seat, I was in awe of the set, and couldn’t help looking up until I spotted the swings. I had already seen the RSC’s promotional video, so I knew what the swings were used for – but I couldn’t wait to see it live! From the opening bars of the band, until the concluding cartwheel, I was covered from head to toe in goose bumps and was taken away, encapsulated in this wonderful story.
Kerry’s portrayal of Matilda was a completely unique take of the character. Her vulnerability instantaneously won the hearts of the audience, whilst still maintaining Matilda’s feisty character, as demonstrated particularly well in Matilda’s first solo song, Naughty. Joining Kerry was an unbelievably talented bunch of children, or should I say actors, who had every ounce of professionalism held by their older colleagues; namely, James Beesley, who played Bruce. His character could be that of a ‘disgusting criminal’ as supposed by Bertie Carvel’s fabulous, show stealing portrayal of Miss Trunchbull. However, his cheeky smile and sensational voice won me over in an instant. Tim Minchin’s lyrics for Revolting Children suited his personality perfectly, and as we had previously fallen in love with Kerry, we fell for James.
About a week later, I came to the courtyard again, this time to see Josie Griffiths as Matilda. Her confidence was second to none, and despite a few slip ups she had the audience as putty in her hands. Again, her supporting cast was faultless and Rebecca Stoll’s performance as Lavender, Matilda’s feisty best friend, was exceptional. Lauren Ward’s portrayal of Miss Honey was enchanting, and at the end of her solo number, My House, I had tears rolling down my cheeks. Once again, Mr and Mrs Wormwood were real life caricatures, played to perfection by Paul Kaye and Josie Walker. Their comedic value echoed that of Matilda’s parents in the film adaptation, played by Danny DeVito and Rhea Pearlman.
Adrianna Bertola’s interpretation of Matilda was enchanting; she had complete command of the stage right from her opening song, Miracle. Her confidence convinced the audience the RSC had made the right decision in letting children take on the lead roles, where before they would’ve been given to adults. Matthew Malthouse’s character Rudolpho was becoming more hilarious with each visit. (Two words: Energy – Flow!) The stunning setting, which on the surface seemed simple, was incredibly versatile, transforming seamlessly from the Wormwoods house to Mrs Phelps library and beyond. Melanie La Barrie’s Mrs Phelps was exceedingly good, winning over every single audience, and I’m sure, cast member, acting as our internal monologue on stage. The carefully crafted storyline, the ideal casting and delightful songs left every person I know stunned. Male friends of mine cringed with embarrassment telling me that, actually, they really enjoyed the performance.
Matilda is a production that will leave an impression on everyone who has the opportunity to see it, and I’m sure will be entertaining audiences for years to come. It has something for everyone, and in the opening number of Act Two, When I Grow Up, these seem to blend together. Adults and children alike are left, not only in awe at the skill of the swingers, but reminiscing and realising ambitions. It is an example of why we should never doubt theatre’s ability to amaze, as confirmed with the Amanda Thripp scene. The choreography, stunts and voices are something that I thought previously could only be achieved in films after months of editing. Well done RSC!
Liberty Jackson, age 17